top of page
server-parts.eu

server-parts.eu Blog

IBM FlashSystem vs IBM Storwize Storage: What Is the Difference?

IBM has long been a leader in enterprise storage, offering solutions designed to a variety of workloads. Two prominent families in IBM’s storage lineup are Storwize (legacy) and FlashSystem (current). While both were designed for reliability and scalability, there are significant differences in their architecture, performance, and features.

.

Save up to 50% on IBM Storage and Parts – Storwize, FlashSystem, SSDs, and HDDs!

 

Comparison: IBM FlashSystem vs IBM Storwize Storage

Feature

Storwize

FlashSystem

Positioning

Legacy storage family (phased out in 2020).

Unified storage platform, replacing Storwize.

Technology

Mix of SAS and some NVMe support.

Fully NVMe-optimized, including IBM FlashCore Modules.

Software

IBM Spectrum Virtualize.

IBM Spectrum Virtualize with AI-driven enhancements.

Scalability

Limited compared to modern storage needs.

Highly scalable up to petabytes.

Primary Use Cases

Small to mid-sized businesses.

SMB to enterprise workloads, including AI/HPC.

A detailed visual comparison of IBM FlashSystem and Storwize storage systems, highlighting key features, differences in architecture, scalability, and performance metrics. This image is part of an in-depth article on enterprise storage solutions by server-parts.eu, aimed at IT professionals exploring options for modern data storage technologies, including NVMe and SAS support for hybrid and all-flash workloads. Refurbished storage.

 

Key Differences in Architecture: IBM FlashSystem vs IBM Storwize Storage


Storage Interfaces:

  • Storwize: Primarily used SAS-attached drives, which are reliable but lack the speed of NVMe. Some models like the V7000 Gen3 introduced NVMe capabilities, but it wasn’t standard.

  • FlashSystem: Fully optimized for NVMe. This allows for significantly lower latency and higher bandwidth, especially for applications requiring fast access, like analytics or AI.


 

IBM FlashCore Modules

  • Storwize models did not include FlashCore Modules.

  • FlashSystem leverages IBM FlashCore Modules, which are NVMe-attached drives with built-in hardware encryption and compression. This reduces data footprint while maintaining high performance.


 

Form Factor and Scalability

  • Storwize: Control enclosures supported 2U or 5U configurations with up to 20 expansion enclosures. Clustering allowed for moderate scalability but topped out compared to FlashSystem.

  • FlashSystem: Supports clustering up to 4 control enclosures, with maximum scalability exceeding 64 PB in the high-end models. This makes FlashSystem better suited for enterprise workloads.


 

Performance Improvements: IBM FlashSystem vs IBM Storwize Storage

Metric

Storwize

FlashSystem

Latency

~500 microseconds

~70-150 microseconds

Bandwidth

Limited by SAS speeds

Full NVMe throughput

IOPS

Moderate, hybrid performance

High-performance all-flash

The IBM FlashSystem lineup offers significantly better performance than the legacy Storwize series, primarily due to its end-to-end NVMe support. NVMe reduces latency to as low as 70 microseconds, compared to the ~500 microseconds typical of SAS-based Storwize systems.


Additionally, the bandwidth improvements are notable, as NVMe drives can handle multiple simultaneous read/write operations far more efficiently than SAS. FlashSystem's support for IBM FlashCore Modules also adds hardware-accelerated compression and encryption, ensuring high performance even with data reduction enabled.


For IOPS-intensive applications like AI, analytics, or large-scale virtualization, FlashSystem outpaces Storwize by delivering consistent and scalable performance.


Comparison of IBM FlashSystem and Storwize storage solutions, highlighting key differences in architecture, performance, scalability, and features. The image supports an article by server-parts.eu explaining how Storwize remains a cost-effective option for general-purpose workloads, while FlashSystem is ideal for AI-driven, hybrid cloud environments. Refurbished options for both systems, available with long warranties, make them accessible for a wide range of IT budgets and infrastructure needs.

 

Software Features: What Stays the Same - IBM FlashSystem vs IBM Storwize Storage


Both families rely on IBM Spectrum Virtualize, offering advanced storage management capabilities like:


  • Data Virtualization: Create a single pool of storage for easier management, enabling seamless resource allocation and reducing operational complexity.


  • Replication: Includes IBM FlashCopy, Metro Mirror, and Global Mirror, which provide robust disaster recovery and high availability for critical workloads.


  • Data Reduction Pools (DRP): Thin provisioning, compression, and deduplication work together to optimize storage efficiency and reduce costs significantly.


  • High Availability: Features like IBM HyperSwap enable active-active configurations, ensuring uninterrupted operations and minimal downtime in case of failures.


What’s New in FlashSystem?

FlashSystem enhances these features with AI-driven capabilities and integration with IBM Storage Insights, a cloud-based analytics tool. These additions enable predictive maintenance, faster troubleshooting, and automated system optimizations. FlashSystem also integrates seamlessly with hybrid cloud environments, making it a future-proof choice for modern IT infrastructures.


 

Why the Transition from Storwize to FlashSystem - IBM FlashSystem vs IBM Storwize Storage


IBM’s decision to retire the Storwize brand and consolidate under FlashSystem was driven by several key factors:


  1. Technological Advancements:

    The rise of NVMe technology and AI-driven workloads required a more modern architecture to meet the demands of low latency, high performance, and scalability. FlashSystem delivers on these requirements with its end-to-end NVMe design, significantly outperforming legacy SAS systems.


  2. Simplified Offerings:

    By unifying their storage solutions under FlashSystem, IBM reduces confusion and streamlines the decision-making process for IT teams. Customers no longer need to navigate multiple product lines, making it easier to select a solution designed to their needs.


  3. Future-Ready Design:

    FlashSystem is built for hybrid cloud environments, offering integration capabilities that support both on-premises and cloud storage. With features like multi-cloud data mobility, FlashSystem ensures businesses can adapt to future demands with minimal disruption.


 

Which One Fits Your Needs: IBM FlashSystem vs IBM Storwize Storage


Despite the transition, Storwize remains a solid choice for many workloads and continues to meet the requirements of most IT infrastructures. It is still available on the refurbished market, often at significantly lower prices, with warranties of up to five years, making it a cost-effective and reliable solution for organizations with tight budgets. For businesses already using Storwize, it is easy to expand existing infrastructure by adding memory, SSDs, HDDs, CPUs, or additional shelves, allowing for scalable growth without replacing the entire system.


However, the new IBM FlashSystem makes sense if your workloads require high performance, scalability, and advanced features for AI, analytics, or hybrid cloud environments. It is the right choice for organizations running latency-sensitive applications, large-scale virtualization, or needing to process massive amounts of data quickly and efficiently.


 

Save up to 50% on IBM Storage and Parts – Storwize, FlashSystem, SSDs, and HDDs!

Comments


bottom of page